Thursday, August 4, 2011

And The Beat Goes On…

by Gordon Cooper

From Broader View Weekly, August 4, 2011.

Let me tell you about my uncle. He’s usually a pretty good guy, always lending a hand to those in need. He doesn’t like to see people suffer, so he has a tendency to overextend himself from time to time. In fact, he has become so “compassionate” toward others that his own children and family have suffered. After spending all his savings, he has been forced to travel far and wide seeking lenders and creditors. Each time he promises a quick repayment, but then he sees another needy soul or another grand project and back to the creditors he goes.

The people to whom he gives so much assistance, however, have become so accustomed to my uncle’s charitable ways that they scream and whine whenever he tries to scale back his gifts or if he asks them to accept some personal responsibility for their own needs.

Now my uncle is so deep in debt that he really needs an intervention. That is why some concerned members of his family and I got together last year and introduced him to some people who would tell him the hard truths about financial security. They met with him and told him he would have to slow down his spending habits, restore his credit rating and to think of his children and grandchildren who would be saddled with his debt.

Of course, my uncle, like so many others who have addictive personalities, doesn’t like the idea of limiting his spending. He seems to think he can just go and find another source of revenue and then everything will be okay. He says he will spend less and be more responsible - if he just gets a little bit more to spend. He seems to think he can spend his way back to a good credit rating if he can only find another lender (China) to borrow a little more or ask for more money (confiscate) from some wealthy people in the neighborhood.

Now, we all know this uncle is our dear old Uncle Sam, and we are all suffering as his children when he doesn’t see the error of his ways. Our current debt – over 14.3 TRILLION DOLLARS, weighing over 315 MILLION POUNDS in $100 bills – is like an anchor on the ship of our economy. She can’t float with that kind of a burden dragging along the bottom of the ocean.

We MUST do something about the debt. Merely raising the ceiling without reinforcing the floor doesn’t make the house fit for the elephant. We need to remodel the house. That means making tough choices and facing hard facts.

Fact number one was raised by former Republican Senator from New Hampshire, John Sununu, writing in the August 8, 2011 issue of Time magazine (pg. 27). He revealed that an alarming 47% of all Americans are receiving at least one Federal benefit. Our uncle is supporting, in one or way another, almost half of us!

People, we have met the enemy and he is us!

This budget problem will not go away – even if the debt ceiling is raised (at the time of this writing, Saturday – 7/30, no deal had been made to raise it by Tuesday) – it will have to be raised again and again, unless and until we get serious about limiting our spending.

This means we (at least 47% of us) have to stop asking our uncle to do things for us we can and should do for ourselves. We have over 24 different job training programs, for example, that are wasteful and redundant. We subsidize everything from Alpaca farmers to Mohair producers to Ethanol blenders to Oil drillers and yet we wonder why our uncle can’t pay his bills.
The time is ripe for a revolution in our way of dealing with our uncle. We need to intervene. Just as we did in November of 2010, we need to tell him the hard truth. He is out of his own money and he just cannot afford to give away other people’s money.
In closing, let me quote a speech I heard recently:

“America, this is our moment. This is our time. Our time to turn the page on the policies of the past. Our time to bring new energy and new ideas to the challenges we face. Our time to offer a new direction for the country we love.

The journey will be difficult. The road will be long. I face this challenge with profound humility, and knowledge of my own limitations. But I also face it with limitless faith in the capacity of the American people. Because if we are willing to work for it, and fight for it, and believe in it, then I am absolutely certain that generations from now, we will be able to look back and tell our children that this was the moment when we began…”


Again, I must give credit where credit is due. The above speech was delivered by Barack Obama on the night he won the primary campaign in June, 2008. I agree. This is our moment. Let’s turn the page on the past and slow down the spending!

7 comments:

Keith said...

Gordon,

I find it interesting that you and your friends were strangely silent when white men like Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush raised the debt limit dozens of times with no wrangling and free of attached budget legislation. GOP faithfuls and those who now are Tea Partiers backed Bush as he spent madly on his two wars and ran up the international credit card. Yet now, in the current administration all the spending is attributed to Obama as far as the Tea Party sect is concerned.

Are the majority of Tea Partiers interested only in cuts that hurt those who can least afford it? Or is it mostly just you and Rush Limbaugh who see the poor as deadbeat freeloaders sucking on the government teat, in need of being kicked to the curb?

Don't you realize that the working poor have paid for those benefits? Social Security and Medicare are necessary because the incomes these folks have access to are so low they can't afford to provide for retirement years. Investment and 401(k) programs have been bled dry by unregulated and dangerous practices in the financial industry.

I agree these programs can be reformed. But it can be done without dismantling and destroying them (and further burdening the poor).

Not only is this attitude why most view conservatives as lacking compassion. The insistence that these "others" are just lazy and dependent is insulting.

K

Gordon said...

Keith,
A few facts. I like the "white guy" reference. Apparently your "liberalism" continues to place people into categories based upon RACE rather than policy or "content of character" (as MLK Jr. recommended.

From Fact Check.org:

Not Exactly 'Routine'
Obama said it has been "routine" for presidents to raise the debt limit in the past. "Since the 1950s, Congress has always passed it, and every president has signed it," he said July 25. That's true — in fact, every president since the 1940s except for Harry Truman raised the debt ceiling. But this increase is the largest in history, in inflation-adjusted dollars.
We only found a few occasions that came anywhere close to the $2.4 trillion increase the White House wants this time around. There was a $1.6 trillion increase, in inflation-adjusted dollars, under President George H.W. Bush, and a $1.2 trillion increase, also inflation-adjusted, under President George W. Bush. During President Jimmy Carter's term, the limit was raised by nearly $1.4 trillion and $1.3 trillion in two separate instances.
FactChecking Dueling Debt Speeches July 26

http://factcheck.org/2011/07/debt-limit-debate-round-up/

I do have more responses to your charges, but unfortunately I do have a life with other responsibilities (i.e. I earn a living by self-employment and 2 part-time jobs) and this will have to do until I get home

Keith said...

If not racism, you explain why you pick now to be critical of deficit spending and raising debt limits when you were quiet when Bush was running up the debt?

Bush raised the ceiling once for each year he was in office ( one of those $1.2 trillion as you state). Obama has been in office for better than 2-1/2 years without touching it till now.

I'm guessing you were implying that as a lazy liberal I have too much time on my hand. Never mind that I have my own tech support business as well as a part time job ( I've worked multiple jobs at time for the past decade). I hope you have an alternative to social security for when you can no longer " do for yourself". If you and your friends get your way the safety net is going away.

K

gordon said...

Keith,
Please tell me where any hint of racism has ever entered my essays. I have stated in my column this week, which was a general statement of FACT about our nation's debt load--- IT IS TOO HIGH -- there was NO mention of Obama until I quoted his speech at the end -- I even left out the part where he said we would see the sea levels corrected and the planet saved because of his nomination - check the transcript. No matter who is running the country, our children and grandchildren are not going to have the same opportunities, unless and until we slow down the spending. There is not enough revenue in the pockets of the rich or the corporations - even if we confiscated 100% - to balance the budget --- IF WE DO NOT SLOW DOWN THE SPENDING!! That was the point of my article--- NOTHING __NOTHING about Obama's race has anything to do with the debt. I see him first and foremost as a politician with an opposing viewpoint. YOU MUST SEE HIM FIRST AND FOREMOST AS A BLACK MAN to make that charge.

You admit reform is needed -- so how do we reform without limiting spending?

Check my column again and you will see I attacked SUBSIDIES and REDUNDANT programs and people taking more than they absolutely need, please re-read my article and please stop using Rush Limbaugh and FOX as my spokesmen. I will stand by my statements. You can say I want to stick it to the poor, but you cannot cite any of MY words that say that. If you want me to judge you according to Matthews, Olbermann, Michael Moore, etc, I can do it, but that would be lazy

Keith said...

Just tell me what's different about Obama other than his race that makes his policies worse than similar policies under folks like Bush and Reagan. You're the one who is making the distinction based on issues other than mere policy. All I'm looking for is another explanation.

From your column:
"The people to whom he gives so much assistance, however, have become so accustomed to my uncle’s charitable ways that they scream and whine whenever he tries to scale back his gifts or if he asks them to accept some personal responsibility for their own needs."

and " an alarming 47% of all Americans are receiving at least one Federal benefit. Our uncle is supporting, in one or way another, almost half of us!

People, we have met the enemy and he is us!"

And the Wealth Gap piece we did months ago was an incriminating mix of racial slams and belittling the poor.

K

Gordon said...

Okay, Not that it will matter to closed minds, but I will try once again to clear the air. In my piece several weeks ago regarding wealth disparity. My assertion then, as in my most recent column, attempted to show that the 40 plus years of anti-poverty programs has been detrimental to the minority family unit. The welfare system penalized marriage (accompanied by the cultural and legal shift to no-fault divorce) which led to more single-parent households - especially in the minority community - which several studies have shown is a major cause of sustained (generational) poverty.NOT RACISM! I have studies to back up these facts -
As for my latest column - PLEASE NOTE the first person plural pronouns WE and US.
Show me where I attacked Obama's race.
IF you think credit and debt is a fine way to live, then vote for more taxes and more spending and start learning Mandarin.

Keith said...

You said you weren't trying to stick it to the poor. I was just offering parts that looked to me like sticking it to them.

You didn't say anything about his race. I made that jump because I can't (and you haven't explained it to me) see why Bush's similar policy was acceptable to you and your Tea Party friends (who didn't even call themselves a group until Obama got into office), and now suddenly those same policies are turning us into China.

K